Skip to main content
A free resource by PharmaTools.AIv2.8

Medical WritingAI Playbook.

You’re expected to use AI. You’re still accountable for every claim. Here’s how to do both.

downloads so far

A growing resource for healthcare communications teams adopting AI workflows.

Each workflow explains:
  • what AI can help with
  • what the writer must verify
  • where mistakes commonly happen
AI for acceleration, not authority. Translation, not invention.

What’s new

Recent additions to the playbook
  • v2.8Choosing Your Model now covers the energy and water behind AI use, and why picking a bigger model than the job needs wastes both. Check your own with the AI Water and Energy Footprint Calculator. Agentic Workflows has a matching note on when a multi-step AI process isn’t worth the extra cost
  • v2.7AI Regulation in Pharma updated now the EU AI Act’s transparency rules are in force (2 August 2026). AI companies have started marking their own output: Claude and Gemini add an invisible watermark to text, and AI-generated images carry hidden labels. Marking is their job, not yours — and it doesn’t replace declaring that you used AI
  • v2.6Declaring AI Use and the disclosure templates updated for JAMA’s stricter policy (August 2026). Three things are now banned outright rather than simply declared: letting AI generate or format references, using AI to draft Opinion pieces and Letters, and AI-made clinical images
See the full changelog →

The workflow lifecycle

The medical writing AI workflow lifecycle: Evidence, Insight, Draft, Adapt, Validate, Deliver

What do you need to do?

Find evidence

Search biomedical databases and build a curated evidence set.

Summarise a paper

Structured summary from a published paper or congress poster.

Congress coverage

Structured poster extractions for rapid congress turnaround.

Extract study data

Pull endpoints, outcomes, and study details into evidence tables.

Extract key messages

Evidence-supported messages from clinical data, organised by theme.

Build an outline

Structure a deliverable from key messages and source materials.

Write a manuscript

Draft a scientific manuscript from study data and references.

Regulatory document

Draft CSR sections, IBs, or Module 2 summaries from source data.

Stats to narrative

Convert statistical outputs and tables into neutral regulatory prose.

Create a slide deck

Slides for MSL training, advisory boards, or medical education.

Concept visuals

AI image generation for concept figures, visual abstracts, and social graphics.

Adapt for audiences

Specialist content rewritten for GPs, nurses, payers, or patients.

Plain language summary

Clinical findings translated into language patients can understand.

Verify claims

Systematic claim-to-reference checking before formal review.

Compliance check

Pre-screen for compliance signals before MLR submission.

Document consistency

Flag inconsistencies in values, terms, and cross-references.

Repurpose content

Approved content adapted across channels and formats.

Final review

The QC gate before any AI-assisted deliverable ships.

Principles

The principles that shape every workflow in this playbook — what counts as appropriate AI use, how to verify it, what to disclose, and where the regulatory limits sit.

Human-in-the-loop

AI drafts. A named professional verifies and signs off. No exceptions.

Source grounding

Every claim traces to a cited source. Nothing enters from AI training data.

Description & Discernment

Brief with rich context, evaluate for voice and accuracy, refine with specifics.

Risk tiers

Four levels define what AI can contribute and what review intensity is required.

Review accountability

Sign-off protocols, audit trails, and clear ownership for every deliverable.

Declaring AI use

What to disclose to journals, regulators, and clients when AI is part of the work.

AI regulation in pharma

The EU AI Act, FDA, EMA, MHRA — and what counts as high-risk in medical writing.

Choosing your model

When to reach for a reasoning model and when a standard LLM is enough.

Agentic workflows

When an agent earns its keep — and when it doesn’t.

AI in peer review

What journals run on your manuscript before a human reviewer sees it.

Risk tiers

Not all tasks carry the same consequences. Four tiers define the AI role, the review process, and what sign-off is required.

Full risk framework →

Workflow-by-workflow risk tiers and review expectations

Tools

Purpose-built tools from PharmaTools.AI for the workflow steps where general-purpose LLMs fall short.

PubCrawl

Literature search and evidence discovery.

RefCheckr

Closed-loop claim verification and rewrite.

MedCheckr

Promotional compliance screening.

Patiently AI

Clinical-to-patient language translation.

LLMentor

Multi-audience content adaptation.

PLS Generator

Plain language summaries from clinical data.

PosterLens

Structured extraction from scientific posters.

New here? Start with the guided reading order →

Role-specific recommendations for medical writers, agency teams, and pharma stakeholders.
A free resource from PharmaTools.AI · v2.8 · Open source on GitHub