Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://playbook.pharmatools.ai/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

A free resource by PharmaTools.AIv2.4 · updated weekly

Medical WritingAI Playbook.

Use AI across the full writing lifecycle – finding evidence, drafting, checking claims, preparing for review – without losing scientific accuracy or regulatory control.

downloads so far

A growing resource for healthcare communications teams adopting AI workflows.

Each workflow explains:
  • what AI can help with
  • what the writer must verify
  • where mistakes commonly happen
AI for acceleration, not authority. Translation, not invention.

What’s new

Latest updates
Recent additions to the playbook
  • v2.4 — The full playbook is now available as a downloadable PDF — every page in a single A4 file, auto-rebuilt on every content update
  • v2.23 — New Generate Concept Visuals workflow covering AI image generation (Nano Banana 2, Midjourney) with prompting patterns and a reality check on what AI images must not be used for
  • v2.22Claude Design added to the Tool ecosystem under a new Design and brand concepting section, framed for medical writers taking on earlier-stage visual concepting
See the full changelog →

The workflow lifecycle

The medical writing AI workflow lifecycle: Evidence, Insight, Draft, Adapt, Validate, Deliver

What do you need to do?

Find evidence

Search biomedical databases and build a curated evidence set.

Summarise a paper

Structured summary from a published paper or congress poster.

Congress coverage

Structured poster extractions for rapid congress turnaround.

Extract study data

Pull endpoints, outcomes, and study details into evidence tables.

Extract key messages

Evidence-supported messages from clinical data, organised by theme.

Build an outline

Structure a deliverable from key messages and source materials.

Write a manuscript

Draft a scientific manuscript from study data and references.

Regulatory document

Draft CSR sections, IBs, or Module 2 summaries from source data.

Stats to narrative

Convert statistical outputs and tables into neutral regulatory prose.

Create a slide deck

Slides for MSL training, advisory boards, or medical education.

Concept visuals

AI image generation for concept figures, visual abstracts, and social graphics.

Adapt for audiences

Specialist content rewritten for GPs, nurses, payers, or patients.

Plain language summary

Clinical findings translated into language patients can understand.

Verify claims

Systematic claim-to-reference checking before formal review.

Compliance check

Pre-screen for compliance signals before MLR submission.

Document consistency

Flag inconsistencies in values, terms, and cross-references.

Repurpose content

Approved content adapted across channels and formats.

Final review

The QC gate before any AI-assisted deliverable ships.

Principles

The principles that shape every workflow in this playbook — what counts as appropriate AI use, how to verify it, what to disclose, and where the regulatory limits sit.

Human-in-the-loop

AI drafts. A named professional verifies and signs off. No exceptions.

Source grounding

Every claim traces to a cited source. Nothing enters from AI training data.

Risk tiers

Four levels define what AI can contribute and what review intensity is required.

Review accountability

Sign-off protocols, audit trails, and clear ownership for every deliverable.

Declaring AI use

What to disclose to journals, regulators, and clients when AI is part of the work.

AI regulation in pharma

The EU AI Act, FDA, EMA, MHRA — and what counts as high-risk in medical writing.

Choosing your model

When to reach for a reasoning model and when a standard LLM is enough.

Agentic workflows

When an agent earns its keep — and when it doesn’t.

AI in peer review

What journals run on your manuscript before a human reviewer sees it.

Risk tiers

Not all tasks carry the same consequences. Four tiers define the AI role, the review process, and what sign-off is required.
TierAI roleReview requiredExamples
LowFirst draft, structuringStandard reviewPaper summaries, outlines, internal briefs
MediumTransformation, adaptationEnhanced review + source cross-checkKey messages, audience adaptation, repurposing
HighLimited drafting supportExpert review, full verificationPromotional claims, PLS, compliance checks
CriticalSupporting role onlyFull expert review, formal sign-offFinal QC before delivery or publication

Full risk framework →

Workflow-by-workflow risk tiers and review expectations

Tools

Purpose-built tools from PharmaTools.AI for the workflow steps where general-purpose LLMs fall short.

PubCrawl

Literature search and evidence discovery.

RefCheckr

Closed-loop claim verification and rewrite.

MedCheckr

Promotional compliance screening.

Patiently AI

Clinical-to-patient language translation.

LLMentor

Multi-audience content adaptation.

PLS Generator

Plain language summaries from clinical data.

PosterLens

Structured extraction from scientific posters.

New here? Start with the guided reading order →

Role-specific recommendations for medical writers, agency teams, and pharma stakeholders.
A free resource from PharmaTools.AI · v2.3