> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://playbook.pharmatools.ai/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Review checklist template

# Review Checklist: \[Deliverable Type]

## Overview

**Deliverable:** \[What is being reviewed]
**Source materials:** \[List the source documents used]
**AI tools used:** \[List any AI tools or workflows used]
**Risk tier:** \[Low / Medium / High]
**Reviewer:** \[Name]
**Date:** \[Date]

***

## Source accuracy

* [ ] All factual claims are supported by the cited source material
* [ ] Numerical data (endpoints, p-values, confidence intervals, sample sizes) are accurately reproduced
* [ ] Study design and population descriptions match the source
* [ ] Timepoints and study phases are correctly represented
* [ ] Statistical significance and clinical significance are correctly distinguished
* [ ] Conclusions align with the source's stated conclusions, not AI interpretation

## Completeness

* [ ] All relevant efficacy findings are included
* [ ] Safety data is present and not minimised or omitted
* [ ] Study limitations are preserved
* [ ] Relevant qualifiers are retained (subgroup, post-hoc, exploratory, interim)
* [ ] Comparator details are accurate and included

## Unsourced content

* [ ] No claims appear that cannot be traced to the provided source materials
* [ ] Background information comes from appropriate, verifiable sources
* [ ] No AI-generated content has been left in that was not verified against a source
* [ ] Definitions or explanations are accurate and appropriate for the audience

## Language and appropriateness

* [ ] Language is appropriate for the target audience
* [ ] Medical terminology is used correctly and consistently
* [ ] No inappropriate certainty (e.g., "proves" instead of "demonstrated")
* [ ] No inappropriate hedging that understates clear findings
* [ ] Tone is consistent and professional

## Compliance (where applicable)

* [ ] Claims are within the approved messaging framework
* [ ] References are correctly cited and support the claims made
* [ ] No off-label implications or suggestions
* [ ] Balance of efficacy and safety information is appropriate
* [ ] Fair balance requirements are met (for promotional content)
* [ ] Prescribing information requirements are addressed (for promotional content)

## Format and structure

* [ ] Deliverable meets the specified format requirements
* [ ] Headings, structure, and flow are logical
* [ ] Length is within the specified range
* [ ] All required sections are present

## AI-specific checks

* [ ] AI-assisted sections have been specifically reviewed for accuracy
* [ ] No hallucinated data, references, or citations
* [ ] No blended or merged findings from different sources or study arms
* [ ] No extrapolated conclusions beyond what the source supports
* [ ] AI outputs have been compared against the original source, not just reviewed for readability

***

## Review outcome

* [ ] **Approved** — content meets all requirements
* [ ] **Approved with minor changes** — changes noted and implemented
* [ ] **Requires revision** — significant issues identified, returned for rework
* [ ] **Rejected** — fundamental accuracy or compliance issues

## Notes

\[Space for reviewer comments, specific issues found, or changes requested]

***

**Reviewer signature:** \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
**Date:** \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_